Retired Camosun Instructor, Linda Cross, asked new instructors to give her a list of questions they would like to have answered by teachers who could draw on years of experience to provide realistic answers.
As a result six experienced teachers were asked questions about 6 topics related to teaching:
- Encouraging Student Participation
- Delivering Course Content
- Managing Classroom Behaviour
- Designing a Grading Process
- Evaluating Student Work
- Developing as a Teacher
Click here to see the insightful video responses…
Join the CID on Sept 15 & 16th as we attend an Educause Focus Session titled, Blended Learning: The 21st-Century Learning Environment online from VCC. This event offers a great opportunity to learn more about blended learning environments while building a community of practice with your colleagues right here at VCC!
The goal of this focus session is to revisit the potential of blended learning instructional models, student learning outcomes, and successful implementation practices. The maturing of online learning practices and engagements has opened new possibilities for curriculum design, including both face-to-face and online learning opportunities. The ability to design a course that uniquely blends face-to-face and distributed interaction allows institutions to address learners’ specific needs and customize the learning environment rather than rely on a “one size fits all” approach. But these options lead to a variety of questions:
- What’s the right mix of face-to-face and online?
- How do you decide when to employ an online activity or interaction?
- How can you best map the mix of blended elements to student needs and requirements?
- How can these elements be orchestrated to meet a course’s learning objectives?
- What are the strengths and weaknesses of various online techniques and methods?
Click here for more information about the session at the ELI website…
This event is sponsored by the Centre for Instructional Development and no registration is required. If you are interested, feel free to attend all or just parts of the sessions that fit into your schedule.
Schedule:
Wednesday September 15, 9:00AM – 2:30AM at Broadway (Room TBA)
Thursday September 16, 9:00AM – 2:30AM at Downtown (Room TBA)
All VCC employees are welcome to attend both sessions – hope to see you there!
Oh yeah, please BYOLunch
RECORDED SESSION NOW AVAILABLE – Click here to view now…
Don’t miss this excellent opportunity organized by in the BC Educational Technology User Group (ETUG).
Research and experience shows that a strong start toward building community can do wonders for learning and engagement in your online course. For most online courses, this begins with the Introductory post or icebreaker activity in Week 1. During this combined 1-hour web conference and one week discussion we will explore (easy, fun, and free) ways to go beyond the plain text forum post.
Live Session in Elluminate: February 12, 2010 at 11:30 GMT (your time zone)
Seminar Facilitator: Gina Bennett
Live Session Facilitator: Tracy Roberts
Visit the session page in SCoPE…
Filed under: Distributed Learning, Instructional Development | Tags: conference, Distributed Learning, moodle
So you can’t make it to Edmonton eh?
Vancouver Community College invites you to attend the 2009 Canada MoodleMoot virtually, as a group from Vancouver.
The Centre for Instructional Development (CID) at Vancouver Community College is hosting a micro
conference centre (MicroMoot) for those wishing to attend the Edmonton Moodle conference as a group,
via web-conferencing. We will provide these services at no cost to VCC employees. In addition to
covering the costs of the conference we will provide moderators to operate the web-conferencing software on behalf of the group.The 2009 Canadian MoodleMoot, hosted by Athabasca University is an onsite conference, taking place April 1 – 4, 2009 in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, and a simultaneous online event using Elluminate Live!
Moodle: Open Spaces, Open Minds is of interest to post-secondary, K-12, business and not-for-profit groups. See keynote presentations from Martin Dougiamas (Moodle), Dr. Alec Couros, (U of Regina), and Dr. Terry Anderson (Athabasca U). Find out more about Moodle directions and emerging practices. Share and network with other Moodlers online and onsite.

External delegates are welcome!
Delegates external to VCC are welcome ‐ just present proof of Virtual Registration or register online during
the event at: http://moodlemoot.ca/moodle/course/view.php?id=116/
When and where?
Thursday, April 2nd – 7:30 AM – 3:30 PM
Room 1227, Broadway Campus (new building)
Friday, April 3rd ‐ 7:30 AM – 3:30 PM
Room 240, Downtown Campus
Saturday, April 4th ‐ 7:30 AM – 12:00 PM
If you are interested in attending this day please
contact dlsupport@vcc.ca
For more information regarding the Edmonton MoodleMoot event (including a detailed schedule) visit: http://moodlemoot.ca. For more information regarding the VCC MicroMoot contact dlsupport@vcc.ca.
Filed under: Instructional Development | Tags: Capilano, centre, development, E-Legacies, PD, professional, UCIPD
The VCC Centre for Instructional Development (CID) and the School of Instructor Education (SIE) attended the provincial Universities, Colleges, and Institutes Professional Developers’ (UCIPD) meeting on Feb 12th 2009 held at the Capilano University Campus in the tranquil and spectacular forests of North Vancouver. Delegates networked and shared strategies and initiatives to build our profiles within the institution.
UCIPD is comprised of representatives from units responsible for professional development at British Columbia’s public post-secondary institutions. The UCIPD group meets twice a year to network, share effective practices, and provide professional development opportunities for professional developers. Innovative ideas shared at the meeting included the following:
- intersecting with institutional strategic plans;
- defining quality teaching, learning and scholarship;
- collecting, publishing or finding champions for outcomes data;
- emphasizing core competencies in all cultures and all disciplines;
- bringing in experts to seed the environment;
- promoting synergy and partnerships by matrixing into all areas;
- having key performance indicators;
- assuring sustainability through succession planning;
- supporting instructor evaluation;
- creating partnerships with areas that support student learning;
- building capacity among faculty through peer review;
- building a community of practice and sharing interprofessional research.
All delegates agreed that it is better to promote excellence than to react to deficiencies in the system and that communications be appreciative, especially in program or curriculum review.
Universities, Colleges, and Institutes Professional Developers’ (UCIPD) Meeting Feb 12th 2009
There were delegates from many faculty education and professional development areas in BC including BCIT, Camosun, Capilano U., CNC, Douglas, Fraser Valley U., Kwantlan Polytechnic U., Thompson Rivers U., UBC, UNBC, and Vancouver Island U.
VCC was well represented by Eva Murray from SIE and Karen Belfer, Ginny Cathcart, Lyn Lennig and Robin Popow of the CID.
Reports included innovative and successful ideas for faculty development such as:
- the integration of reflective practice, transformative dialogue, narrative pedagogy (storytelling and appreciative inquiry); self and peer evaluation and mentorship into professional development;
- the use of Podcasting and Webinars;
- assessing teaching effectiveness through use of Small Group Instructor Feedback (SGIF);
- developing teaching and research e-portfolios;
- integration of Aborginal values into teaching and learning;
- curriculum development;
- supporting education research and scholarship;
- using personal response devices (Clickers) to assess faculty needs;
- Hosting guest presenters or guest faculty to seed new ideas;
- coordinating courses like the Instructor Skills Workshops (ISW) & Instructor refreshers.
VCC CID and SIE delegates harvested many ideas for future meetings and symposia including developing and using research-based best practices. Summaries of the two keynote presentations follow for your interest. All in all it was a wonderful and very educational day.
Graham Fane, instructor in the School of Business, presented a unique initiative leading up to the Olympics, which will provide curriculum for educational institutions everywhere. The group created small vignette cases posing hypothetical questions, and outcomes to start discussion. Faculty can shop the portal for teaching resources and there will be a wide range of topics not just tourism, but also politics, kinesiology, etc. that will serve as a comprehensive information exchange. The project will bring local students together with students from European institution partners to “host” Olympic visitors, officials and athletes.
The E-Legacies Resource Hub-integrates the Olympics into every course at Capilano University bringing the 2010 Olympics to the classroom whether positive or not thus providing a cross section of views. The project was spear headed by LinkBC at Capilano’s Tourism faculties with 20 institutions linked together electronically. The group will use this portal of connection to get curriculum out. Soon after they started they discovered that the Olympics could have an international legacy for the future.
Exploring Pathways into Professional Development – Alice Macpherson
Currently there is no prescribed pathway (e.g., credentials) into the profession of educational/faculty/professional development, no unifying position profile that captures who we are and what we do, nor a clear cut path to guide advancement within the field.
Delegates participated in a focus group as to what draws people to the profession, the routes that facilitate their entry and advancement within the field, and the contexts in which they happen are not clear or consistent. The Pathways research agenda, therefore, is designed to build a better understanding of:
- why people become involved in educational development activities;
- what enables (or inhibits) some individuals to enter into and progress within the field of educational development; and
- what enables (or inhibits) them to commit to a primary appointment in educational development.
Best wishes to retiring members Nancy Randall (VIU) & Penny Heaslip (TRU)
Filed under: Distributed Learning, Instructional Development | Tags: AABE, Aboriginal ABE, e-portfolio
The AABE e-Portfolio Project is a three year collaboration between the Native Education Centre (NEC) http://www.necvancouver.org and VCC. Since September, 2008, NEC students have been engaged in a process of gathering, evaluating and presenting evidence to demonstrate competencies met for English12 and Math 11. These e-portfolios form part of the BC Adult Graduation Diploma requirements for English 12 and Math 11.
What are e-Portfolios?
Why e-Portfolios?
Definition and Role in Education
“A purposeful collection of student work that exhibits the student’s efforts, progress, and achievements in one or more areas.” ”(Del Vecchio et.al, 20001)
A portfolio assessment is the evaluation of knowledge about a particular subject area, supported by a written reflection of the learning that has been experienced. Students gather, evaluate, and present authentic examples to demonstrate meeting course learning outcomes.
What’s in it for students?
Project manager, Wendy Seale-Bakes, suggests the educational value of portfolios and e-portfolios specifically include:
- Demonstrates progression and depth of learning achieved
- Invites reflection
- Encourages creativity
- Encourages integration of factual and creative
- Focuses on the experience of learning & metacognitive thinking
- Provides evidence of learning
Why does it fit well with the profile of AABE students?
- Focus on self directedness
- Holistic approach to assessment and learning
- Opportunity to enhance self-esteem
- Documentation of learning and competency
- Students own the portfolios and may use them for employment or further education

Native Education Centre Longhouse, Vancouver, B.C.
Some Pedagogical Reflections
How do we know our students are learning? How do they know? Through the portfolio process, students become more aware of the learning outcomes for their courses, and engage in a regular process of reflection on how well they are achieving those outcomes. The portfolio process enhances learning at the same time as it contributes to learner self-awareness, confidence, and a sense of control over learning.
Working with the instructors and students at the Native Education College has helped Wendy and other VCC instructors involved in this project appreciate Aboriginal ways of knowing, learning, and being, and to understand that culturally appropriate education means more than just adjusting content for First Nations, Inuit, and Metis learners. It involves a different way of seeing the world and how we live in it.
[1] Del Vecchio, A., Gustke, C. & Wilde, J. (2000). Alternative Assessment for Latino Students. In J.V. Tinajero & R.A. DeVillar (Eds.), The Power of Two Languages (pp. 365 – 382). New York: McGraw-Hill
The CID now offers two new services for Instructional Development: Student Surveys and Small Group Instructional Feedback (SGIF). These services allow faculty to gather formative feedback from students regarding instructional practices outside the official appraisal processes. Faculty looking for ways to engage their students in a qualitative analysis of the teaching and learning process can do so by contacting an Instructional Associate. The process is voluntary and confidential and the benefits of implementing formative Student Surveys and SGIFs have been researched for more than 20 years.
Some of the benefits to the instructors and the students include:
- Increased communication between instructor and students.
- Increased student motivation.
- Increased student involvement (share views and negotiate a common strategy for dealing with challenges).
- Increased instructor awareness of what is working for students and what isn’t.
- Increased student engagement in suggesting problem-solving strategies.
- Improved (end of term) quality of instruction when feedback is gathered mid-term.
References:
Cohen, A. P. (1980). Effectiveness of student-rating feedback for improving college instruction: A meta-analysis of findings. Research in Higher Education, 13(4), 321-341. weblink…
Clark, D. J., Redmond, M. V. (1982). Small Group Instructional Diagnosis: Final Report. Fund for the Improvement of Post-secondary Education (ED), Washington, DC. ED217954 weblink…
Small Group Instructional Feedback (SGIF)- Briefly outlines the SGIF process and the benefits of taking part in it. University of British Columbia Teaching and Academic Growth. weblink…




